Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume

Every so often something momentous happens in life. A Special Forces Soldier or Navy Seal does something that awakens American pride,  a Marine will display the courage and personal sacrifice that has made the Marine Corps what it is, and always will be. A Police Officer or Deputy will face down the more brutal people that inhabit our society. A Firefighter will run into a building that others are trying to escape from. A Paramedic or E.M.T. will face death simply by doing their jobs. Most often though? These things simply go unnoticed because that is the sort of thing that people like that do. Medals and publicity are more for the public than the men and women that do the hard things that are needed in today’s world.

Then there are the glory hogs. An awful lot of the time it turns out that those people simply are not what they say that they are. They come in all shapes and sizes, races, and religions. They come in all professions and trades too. Including politicians. Sometime ago, on another blog I took some serious flak when I commented that I would sooner vote for an honest reformed felon than a dishonest but un-convicted person for political office.

In the case of the current President some things just have not added up. Period.

Hat Tip to Anthony G. Martin for putting this all together.

In what is being called ‘the biggest hustle in human history,’ a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama’s resume, including the outright lie that he was a ‘Constitutional scholar and professor.’

The claim turns out to be false.

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be.  The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false–fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by ‘the Blogging Professor,’ the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama.  The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a ‘constitutional professor and scholar,’ and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an ‘instructor’ at Chicago Law School, not a professor.  Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham.  The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Thus,  the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a ‘put-up job’ as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position?  And why?

Further,

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady – who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, “Obama did NOT ‘hold the title’ of a University of Chicago law school professor”. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6. “He did not hold the title of professor of law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in ourConstitution: the notion that we are all created equal.”

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight.  And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama’s presence in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENTjust as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous ‘journalists,’ promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information ‘they may discover.’

For commentary on the issues of the day, visit my blog at The Liberty Sphere.

About these ads

Tags: , , , , , , ,

11 Responses to “Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume”

  1. TexasFred Says:

    So, what is going to be DONE about it??

  2. uberVU - social comments Says:

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by America1First: Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume … http://bit.ly/bQ0eL7 – Freedom…

  3. Sunflower Ranch Says:

    Wow! Really disturbing. Thank you for your continued work in this area. We have the right to know the truth. Keep digging!!!

  4. Chuck Says:

    Well, we can all start by voting in the next congressional election. That will put an end to his free reign over the American people. Then we can vote again in 2012 to elect someone qualified to hold the office….just my thoughts.

    WE need to reclaim our government from these snake-oil salesmen…alas I mean no insult to snake oil salesmen…but we need to run these guys out of office. We pound our fists and declare injustice, but millions of us still choose to sit at home on election day. The first order of business is getting folks to vote. Now that would be change!

  5. Tweets that mention Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume « Conservative Libertarian Outpost -- Topsy.com Says:

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kathy Genta, Bradley Hummel, BJ, Kelly, DominoQ and others. DominoQ said: Big Time Grifter-in-Chief!–>Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume http://bit.ly/bQ0eL7 [...]

  6. Patrick Sperry Says:

    I would prefer impeachment and conviction for fraud. That however has almost the same chance of seeing a snowball in hell, or developing a strain of pigs that fly.

    In the meantime voting them from office appears to be the most viable plan.

  7. Chuck Says:

    Agree, there is no chance of the latter happening.

    The most disturbing fact is that 43% of voting age US citizens failed to get off their butts to vote. Granted, some may be mentally or physically incapable of voting, but that still leaves a huge number of apathetic numb skulls out there. Getting these folks interested in their country would be a real revolution.

  8. Tanaka Destroys Blackwell: PCW Extreme Political TV on P-SPAN « Political Championship Wrestling Says:

    [...] Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume [...]

  9. mainenowandthen Says:

    I had previously heard that Obama was not a “professor”, but instead a “visiting lecturer” at the University of Chicago.

    Despite his egomania, I believe that Obama is well aware of his paper-thin resume and his lack of both qualifications and character despite having been elected to the nation’s highest post.

    Hopefully, revelations of his true qualifications (or lack thereof) will continue to surface and be well-publicized.

  10. Anne Beal Says:

    The first black member of the Review was Charles Hamilton Houston, LL.B. cum laude 1922, S.J.D. 1923, who served on Volume 35. The second black member was William Henry Hastie LL.B. cum laude 1930, a member of the Board of Volume 43, who later became Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Other black members of the Board have included William T. Coleman, Jr., J.D. magna cum laude 1943 (’46), later Secretary of Transportation, and current Harvard Law School Professors Christopher F. Edley, Jr. (Volume 90) and David B. Wilkins (Volume 93). As the Review enters its second century, it has just elected its first minority President. Raj Marphatia of Volume 101.

    I found this on the Harvard Law Review site. So what color was Raj Marphatia? Obama claimed to be the first “black” president, of Volume 104

  11. Patrick Sperry Says:

    And the list just keeps on growing…

Comments are closed.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 198 other followers

%d bloggers like this: